Skip to content
Ad Hominem

Fallacy

Ad Hominem

Also known as: Personal Attack

Category
Fallacy
Main group
Informal Fallacy
Subgroup
Rhetorical Tactic
Difficulty
easy (1/3)
Argumentation order
1. Argument

Description

Instead of criticizing the opponent's statement, the person is attacked personally to discredit their opinion.

Example

Judge: "Can you prove the defendant is guilty?"

Prosecutor: "With all due respect, if you believe he is innocent, you are being naive."

> Instead of arguing the merits of the case, the prosecutor questions the judge's competence.

Limitations

In a moderate form, questioning an authority can be useful to precisely verify the expertise of their statements.

In politics, personal degradation is unfortunately a common occurrence.

Researched by

Arthur Schopenhauer

See also

Questionable Motives

Tu Quoque

Source