Skip to content
Affirming the Consequent

Fallacy

Affirming the Consequent

Also known as: Converse Error

Category
Fallacy
Main group
Formal Fallacy
Subgroup
Deductive Fallacy
Difficulty
medium (2/3)
Argumentation order
1. Argument

Description

A false conclusion that arises as follows:

The statement

"If A, then B"

is affirmed and the following conclusion is drawn:

"If B, then A".

Example

"If it rains, the street is wet.

The street is wet, therefore it rained."

Limitations

Related to the Inversion Error – both stem from confusing logical implication with logical equivalence.

If the condition is the only possible cause of the consequence, the conclusion may happen to hold in a particular case – as a form of proof it remains invalid.

See also

Non Sequitur

Inversion Error

Opposite

Deduction

More information on Wikipedia